July 10, 2006

Sharia Republic

Mogadishu, the capital of Somalia is becoming like Kabul, Afghanistan under the Taliban

If Sub-Saharan African nations have problems, then the Republic of Somalia is just about as bad as it ever gets. Without a central government for over 15 years, this land consisting of two entities (relatively peaceful and self-declared Republic of Somaliland to the north and lawless Somalia to the south) has defied all attempts at bringing sanity to what was once an aspiring and modern African republic.

Last month, Islamists took over the Somali capital of Mogadishu, and in line with their tenets, imposed Islamic Sharia law. While they promised to protect all people in the city, it wasn't too long before the madness of fundamentalism and fanaticism began rearing its ugly head.

Reports from CNN tell of two people who were shot dead at a place that was showing the 2006 Football World Cup matches. While those responsible for the killings have been put on trial, one sees signs of Taliban era Afghanistan in present-day Mogadishu. The screenings of World Cup matches, as well as other forms of television entertainment have been banned in Mogadishu, thanks to strict interpretation of Sharia. Furthermore, when one reads of Islamic militia men breaking up a wedding in Mogadishu because a "band was playing and men and women were socializing together", one cannot but weep for the fact that Somalia's future, if it has got any, just got bleaker.

From Northern Nigeria to Somalia, the craze by the ruling class to see that people abide by Arabic cultural values as promulgated by their interpretation of the Islamic religion is baffling. Why should 21st century African societies be subject to 7th century Arabic laws? Furthermore, even in the Arab nations of North Africa, Sharia law holds less sway than it does in say Northern Nigeria and of recent, in Somalia.

While I search for some logical explanations as to why boys and girls should not sit in the same classrooms, why men and women must not congregate together or socialize in public, why women get stoned for the crimes of fornication, adultery or giving birth to a child out of wedlock, why women must adhere to a dress code imposed by the ruling theocratic class and why one needs a morality police to ensure that citizens abide by divine norms, I remain deeply uneasy with any African society that has chosen to subject itself to Sharia law as interpreted by its often corrupt ruling class.

Four years ago, there were riots by Islamic fanatics over the hosting of the 2002 Miss World competition in Nigeria. Hundreds of non-Muslims were killed and a fatwa issued against a journalist for statements she made about the Prophet of Islam. The Danish cartoons incident also comes to mind. A Copenhagen-based newspaper caricatures the Prophet of Islam and 7000 kilometers away in Northern Nigeria, Muslim fanatics vent their anger on their fellow country men and women who happen not to share their faith. A few weeks back, a girl went around distributing leaflets in Niger State [Nigeria], which criticized both Jesus Christ and Prophet Mohammed—some minutes later, she is attacked by an Islamic mob and lynched to death.

My question is this: what room does Sharia law give for the creation of a pluralistic society? Or, how does Sharia law accommodate the existence of pluralism? As with most things with Islam as practiced in Northern Nigeria, asking too many questions could be dangerous--only a thin line exists between what is considered a genuine question and an open attack on Islam. Until the day comes when Islam can be openly and frankly discussed on the streets of Northern Nigeria without the fear of a mob attack, enlightenment of the individual mind in that part of the world would remain an illusion. As for Somalia, it needs one of two things to set it on the right path—a miracle, or foreign intervention. The last thing any African nation needs today is Taliban-style madness, which is precisely what one sees in Mogadishu.

Related Blog Article: The Talibanization Of Northern Nigeria

Labels: , , ,


>>Go to HomePage
Posted by Chippla Vandu, 5:25 PM | links to this post


10 Comments:

Amen, Chippla. I expressed similar sentiments on my blog yesterday about this mess. Music and dancing and go hand in hand in black African cultures, and that occurred in Somalia long before Islam came on the scene. This is what happens when Arab cultural imperialism is allowed to inflict itself upon a predominantly black country, as has unfortunately been the case across Africa. Now black Africans are its enforcers, based upon an Arab cultural ethic.
Posted by Blogger Shay at July 10, 2006 6:05 PM  
A pluralistic society is a misnomer under sharia. To expect a foreign intervention after what happened to the US forces in Somalia some couple of years back is asking for the moon. (See the movie: Black Hawk Down). It will never happen.

From the look of things Somalia and its nationals have a quite a hectic time ahead; no thanks to the sharia-loving bandits roaming free in their land.
Posted by Blogger Imnakoya at July 11, 2006 3:25 AM  
Sadly, this goes to prove that when there's years of chaos, people will gravitate toward ANYTHING that gives a facade of stability. Any sort of fascist regime feeds on chaos or the perception thereof to bolster itself. We can't simply condemn the fascists and demand the country return to anarchy. The international community must do more to support the transitional government in the country.
Posted by Blogger Brian at July 11, 2006 5:43 AM  
Brian,

But where is the chaos in Northern Nigeria that causes people to gravitate towards Sharia law? In Somalia, this is understandable. To the best of my knowledge, Somalia's transitional government is still largely based in Kenya. Which government should the international community then work with? The Kenya-based government or the Islamists who now control Mogadishu and its environs?

The African Union (AU) is meant to be sending troops to Somalia soon i.e. if they are able to find the necessary funds. I really do not know if this would make much of a difference. Darfur is still a nightmare, despite the presence of AU troops.
Posted by Blogger Chippla Vandu at July 11, 2006 10:35 AM  
nice article, thanks for educating me.

sharia...what a shame. as much as we love to hate the USA i could never live anywhere which didn't share the same ideology with them: "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".

peace, love, happiness, unity and respect is what "we" believe in, not sharia!

emancipate yourself from mental slavery (religious) slavery, non but us can free our minds. words of the Marley, need i say more.
Posted by Anonymous TRAE at July 11, 2006 1:25 PM  
It might interest you to read Jeffrey Tayler's analysis of the Nigerian situation, worse than Iraq apparently. I agree with what his saying on some level, but he's too much of a doom monger.

Also I think you should make a distinction between Islamic culture and Arab culture. Islam is by no means exclusively Arab, and just like Christianity, Islam has been localised within many cultures - Turkish, Persian, Arab, Berber, Nigerian. Shari'ah is Islamic law rather than an Arab form of jurisdiction.

Since you're wondering where pluralism exists within Islam, I recommend an article I read in this month's UK Prospect magazine. It's a question Europe has to deal with, because Europe's muslims won't go away, and they have to live with them. I'm sure some of these ideas can be translated to any other national setting.
Posted by Blogger Nkem at July 14, 2006 11:38 AM  
Chippla

I think the answer to your question is reform. The same type of reform which every religion undergoes at some point in its evolution. Christianity has reformed, Judaism has reformed, Islam will reform, it is the natural course of things.

Unfortunately the reform of the Muslim world has been intentionally stifled, most specifically in the Middle East. It's been stifled by rulers who have used sharia law to keep the people in ostensibly seventh century conditions, at least as it pertains to modern morality.

Fundamentalist Islamic thinking has now spread around the world, and has found fertile ground in North Africa which is so closely connected to the Middle East geographically and culturally.

People are being killed in Iraq for wearing short pants, shorts for god sakes. That really is something out of the seventh century, and something that most people in the Western can hardly conceive of.

Our job in the Western world is to help them reform, not alienate them or crush them militarily, but assist them in their efforts to reform by supporting leaders who support reform. Not by supporting despots who keep their people enslaved to a large extent. Something the United States and the European powers have done by supporting Saddam Hussein's regime, and the royal family in Saudi Arabia, and many others.

Osama bin Laden specifically mention Somalia in his last message, if Islamic fundamentalism keeps spreading its message at the current rate, the West will never be able to contain it, and eventually it could become a world power that will truly be able to rival the free world.

But it's important to remember that if it does so, this accomplishment has been largely with the assistance of the West, specifically through its abuse and misuse of the Muslim world and the Middle East.

Ultimately we only have ourselves to blame for the current problems, it's nobody's fault but ours, to a large extent.
Posted by Blogger Aaron X at July 15, 2006 7:15 PM  
I have always believed Sharia Law is a form of religious oppression. Unfortunately the people who are being oppressed are the same people who practice this religion and to a large extent many non-muslims are also made to suffer in the madness. I don't trust Sharia Law period. Even if the imposers of this law bring order to the land...you know what they say...powr corrupts.

P.S.: I saw your photo for the first time today Chippla on your website. You look much younger than I imagined.
Posted by Anonymous Rosie at July 17, 2006 10:28 PM  
My colleague in Kano says the law is not being upheld strongly as it is portrayed by the media.
Posted by Blogger Anthony Arojojoye at July 19, 2006 10:52 AM  
Nkem,

I am in agreement with you about the need for me to distinguish between the Islamic religion (culture) and Arab culture. However, what I try to point out is that the Sharia legal system had its roots in 7th century Arab society. Thus, though Sharia is a part of the Islamic religion, the underlying tenets on which it is based are of the Arab culture.

The main problem I have with Sharia, as implemented in parts of northern Nigeria and now Somalia, is that it prevents society from progressing because being "God's law," no one is meant to question it. Sharia gives no room for dialog or discussion.
Posted by Blogger Chippla Vandu at July 22, 2006 8:15 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link